Categories
News

Winding up the Chinese B share market

It’s rare that anything interesting happens in China’s moribund B share market, but the last couple of weeks have been an exception – even if all the developments point to it no longer existing in the relatively near future.

Owing to China’s capital controls, there are several different types of stock listings used by Chinese companies. To recap quickly:

  • A shares are mainland-incorporated Chinese companies listed on the mainland Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges and are denominated in renminbi. They can only be bought by mainland Chinese investors and a very limited number of qualified foreign institutional investors.
  • B shares are mainland-incorporated Chinese companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen and are denominated in US dollars (in Shanghai) and Hong Kong dollars (in Shenzhen). They can be freely bought both by foreigners and by mainland investors with foreign currency accounts.
  • H shares are mainland-incorporated Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong. They can be freely bought by foreigners.
  • Red chips are companies controlled by the Chinese state, but legally incorporated outside mainland China and listed in Hong Kong. Again, they can be freely bought by foreigners.
  • P chips are companies controlled by private sector Chinese businessmen that are legally incorporated outside mainland China and listed abroad. Usually, P chip is used to mean specifically Hong Kong listed stocks, with S chip being used for private firms listed in Singapore and (less commonly) N share for US-listed Chinese companies and L share for London-listed Chinese companies.
Categories
News

TD Direct to raise international commissions

TD Direct Investing (formerly and still almost universally referred to as TD Waterhouse) has announced new fees with effect from February 2013 [PDF]. I’ll update the details on this site closer to the time, but the key changes are summarised here [PDF] and appear to be mostly negative. In brief, they are:

Categories
News

Fastrade to rebrand and change fees in 2013

Charles Stanley‘s Fastrade service – notable for being one of the cheapest ways to get CREST Personal Member Account – is going to be rebranded as Charles Stanley Direct in the new year. The firm is promising that this isn’t just cosmetic and the new service will be improved; less encouragingly, it will also be raising some fees later in the year.

While the new fees haven’t yet been posted on the site, they have been emailed to a contributor on a Motley Fool UK discussion, from where I’ve copy and pasted them below:

Categories
News

Bangladesh may ease controls on foreign investors

Finance Asia recently carried some comments from an official in Bangladesh saying that they were looking at reducing restrictions on foreign investors bringing money into the country. The whole story will probably disappear behind the Finance Asia paywall soon, but here’s the key points:

Categories
News

TD Direct rebrands Internaxx

TD Direct Investing (formerly known as TD Waterhouse) has renamed its Luxembourg division from Internaxx to TD Direct Investing International. Apart from standardising the brand, I imagine this is also part of breaking with the Fortis era. Internaxx began as a joint venture between TD Waterhouse and the Fortis-controlled Banque Générale du Luxembourg in 2001, with TDW buying out Fortis’ stake after the latter was nationalised in the 2008 crisis.

Categories
News

Singapore stocks on the LSE

Barring any last-minute glitches, the London Stock Exchange will be launching trading in major Singapore-listed stocks on Monday 19th November, as part of a cross-listing agreement announced in July. Reciprocal trading in FTSE 100 stocks on the Singapore Exchange is intended to start in the first half of 2013.

There will be 37 Singapore stocks initially (Straits Times Index and MSCI Singapore Free constituents) and trading will be on the LSE’s new International Board. This is distinct from the International Order Book (where depository receipts trade) and the European Quoting Service and European Trade Reporting Service, the new MiFID services that have replaced the old International Retail Service.

Categories
News

Legal status of ADRs

Earlier this year, HSBC won a case against HM Revenue and Customs involving the payment of stamp duty on ADRs as part of its ill-fated purchase of US sub-prime lender Household in 2003. It wasn’t exactly a high-profile case and I only stumbled across it recently while searching for something completely different. But looking at legal commentary on it, the judgment raised an awkward question about the legal status of American depository receipts (ADRs).

ADRs in brief

An ADR provides a way for shares in a foreign company to be traded on US exchanges. The underlying foreign shares traded on the overseas exchange are deposited in a custodian bank and the depository bank issues a receipt giving the buyer rights over these shares. This receipt can be traded in the US markets – either on exchange or off-exchange depending on the nature of the ADR – just like a normal share. See here for a fuller explanation of how ADRs work.

The buyer of the ADR is not recorded on the company’s shareholder register, but they are entitled to all the economic benefits from them and we usually work on the basis that the investor is the beneficial owner. This is actually how most domestic shares are held these days anyway – rather than the individual investor being on the shareholder register, they are held “in street name”/”in nominee”, which means the legal owner is a non-trading subsidiary of your broker, but you are the beneficial owner (English law, and systems derived from it, allowing strict legal title to be separated from beneficial rights).

Crucially, beneficial ownership separates the shares from the assets of the stock broker, meaning that in the event the firm fails, they are not available to the broker’s creditors – the investor still has rights over them. So HSBC’s case against HMRC was interesting because the tribunal found itself considering the question of whether an ADR actually carries a beneficial ownership in the underlying shares.

Categories
News

Unbundled pricing for UK fund supermarkets

The FSA’s Retail Distribution Review (RDR) is set to shake up investment costs in the UK enormously over the next year or so. With effect from January 2013, financial advisers will no longer be able to receive trail commission – ongoing payments from fund groups – on new investments.

More importantly for DIY investors, the FSA is then likely to ban fund platforms for receiving trail commission with effect from January 2014. This means that the fees currently charged by many execution-only firms will have to change drastically.

Once that happens, many of the details in this site’s UK fund supermarket comparison table will change significantly. Unfortunately, exactly what fund supermarket pricing will look like once RDR is complete isn’t clear, making it hard to choose a new provider at the moment.

However, many of the major fund platforms have now announced their “unbundled” charging schemes – unbundled meaning that they must transparently and explicitly charge the investor for their services, rather than getting paid a platform fee in the background out of trail commission. And this is beginning to give us some idea of what fees may look like in a year or so.

Categories
News

Thailand joins Asean Trading Link

As scheduled, Thailand joined Singapore and Malaysia on the Asean Trading Link last week. Going by news coverage and a couple of conversations I’ve had, Thai investors and brokers seem to be more enthusiastic about the project than anybody else.

That’s understandable – the historical ties between Malaysia and Singapore mean that anybody from one country who was keen to invest in the other could do so fairly easily and at reasonably low cost. But while there are  brokers in Thailand who can already access other Asian markets, the link promises to make it a bit easier and cheaper for local investors there to invest in neighbouring countries – and, going the other way, also hopefully increase interest from foreign investors in Thai stocks.

Categories
News

Barclays and the spirit of RDR

Citywire is reporting proposals by Barclays to counteract the FSA’s forthcoming Retail Distribution Review ban on funds paying trail commission to intermediaries, by trying to charge the fund providers “administration fees” for having their products on its platform.

Whether the FSA will permit this isn’t clear, but the idea seems to go against the initial spirit of RDR. The FSA’s professed goal is for all the costs to be transparent to the client – they should be paying explicit charges for using the platform, as a flat fee or percentage of their holdings. Not imposing these and instead charging opaque admin fees to providers is not significantly different to the current system of trail commission.

It’s hard to argue that this comes out of the provider’s own margins – that simply means that rather than management fees falling to (say) 0.75% to reflect what the fund firm currently gets, they will just fall to (say) 1% to cover the extra payment that the firm must make to the platform. It will be an implicit share of the fees rather than an explicit one, but the same outcome.